PENGARUH FINANCIAL TARGET, PERGANTIAN AUDITOR TERHADAP FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD DENGAN PERGANTIAN DIREKSI SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING PADA INDUSTRI PERBANKAN INDONESIA
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of Financial Target, Change in auditor with the change of directors as an intervening variable on Financial Statement Fraud. This study uses the theory of fraud pentagon. The approach used in this study is a descriptive quantitative approach. The population of this study is banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research period in this study is from 2014 to 2019. The data used in this study is secondary data obtained from the company's annual financial statements. A purposive sampling technique was used to determine the research sample. There were 29 companies selected. Data analysis in this study used the path analysis method. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the fraud pentagon theory has an effect on financial statement fraud, especially for auditor turnover in the banking industry listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The high turnover of auditors in a company leads to higher indications of financial statement fraud.
Keywords: Financial Target, Change in Auditor, Change in Director, Financial Statement Fraud, Fraud pentagon theoryFull Text:
75-86 (PDF)References
Arens, A., dan Loebbecke, J. 2003. Auditing Pendekatan Terpadu. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Craja, P., Kim, A., & Lessmann, S. (2020). Deep learning for detecting financial statement fraud. Decision Support Systems, 139, 113421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113421
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement.
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., & Larson, C. R. SloanR. G. 2011. Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research28 (1): 17–82.
Gee, J., & Button, M. (2019). The financial cost of fraud 2019: The latest data from around the world.
Georgescu, A., Peter, M. K., & Avasilcai, S. (2022). Associative and Non-associative Business Structures: A Literature Review for the Identification of Business Development Opportunities for SME in the Digital Age. Marketing and Smart Technologies, 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9272-7_28
Haqq, A. P. N. A., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2019). Fraud Pentagon for Detecting Financial Statement Fraud. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 22(3), 319-332.
Lou, Y. I., & Wang, M. L. (2009). Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i2.2262
Listyawati, I. (2020). Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan Terhadap Tindak Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. Maksimum, 10(1), 41-46.
Lindasari, V. (2019). Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Ukuran Perusahaan sebagai Variabel Moderating menggunakan Pentagon Analisis. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan (pp. 2-3).
Nguyen, K. (2010). Financial statement fraud: Motives, methods, cases and detection. Universal-Publishers.ISBN-10: 1-59942-319-7; ISBN-13: 978-1-59942-319-7
Octaviani, S., & Komalasari, D. (2017). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, dan Solvabilitas Terhadap Harga Saham. JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 4(1).
Priantara, D. 2013. Fraud auditing & investigation. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media
Purwanegara, M., Apriningsih, A., & Andika, F. (2014). Snapshot on Indonesia regulation in mobile internet banking users attitudes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.423
Rusmana, O., & Tanjung, H. (2020). Identifikasi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan fraud pentagon studi empiris BUMN terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 21(4).
Singleton, T. W., & Singleton, A. J. (2010). Fraud auditing and forensic accounting (Vol. 11). John Wiley & Sons.ISBN 978-0-470-56413-4; ISBN 978-0-470-87748-7 (ebk): ISBN 978-0470-87790-6 (ebk) ; ISBN 978-0-470-87791-3 (ebk)
Shiwen, S. (2021). Analysis of The Effect of Supervision on Employee Performance with Employment Conflict as Moderator in Steel Company. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 4(9), 242-244
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. In Corporate governance and firm performance. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005
Tamimi, O. (2021). The role of internal audit in risk management from the perspective of risk managers in the banking sector. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 15(2), 114-129. doi:10.14453/aabfj.v15i2.8
Tiapandewi, N. K. Y., Suryandari, N. N. A., & Susandya, A. P. G. B. A. (2020). Dampak Fraud Triangle Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Kumpulan Hasil Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi (KHARISMA), 2(2).
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52333%2Fkompetitif.v11i2.989
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.